Job Seeker News Hubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Career
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Talent Acquisition
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Career
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Talent Acquisition
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Job Seeker News Hubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Talent Acquisition

Appeals court sends Browning-Ferris orders back to NLRB

admin by admin
August 2, 2022
in Talent Acquisition


This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

A federal appeals court July 29 reversed orders in an infamous joint employment case, Browning-Ferris, remanding it to the National Labor Relations Board.

The dispute has spanned three presidential administrations and shifted the joint-employment landscape with respect to National Labor Relations Act compliance and liability. The initial ruling established a standard that expanded the definition of “joint employer” to companies with indirect control over workers. It was temporarily replaced, but later put back into effect.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has been involved in reviewing the standard for years and Friday held that NLRB improperly applied its standard to conclude that the employer in the case, a waste management company, didn’t have to bargain with workers supplied by a staffing company; it largely concluded that the Board failed to properly explain its reasoning for that outcome.

For other employers, “[w]hile the ultimate disposition of the Browning-Ferris case is meaningful, a new joint employer rulemaking would present much more risk for the employer community,” according to Kurt G. Larkin, partner at Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP.

And such a rulemaking is in the works, according to NLRB. The agency missed two self-imposed deadlines for proposing regs this year — once in February and again in July — but delays are not unusual for rulemakings.

Employers can generally expect an employee-friendly rule that would formalize a lower bar for joint employment, according to Larkin. “The likely focus of rulemaking would be to align the board’s joint employer rules with the original Browning-Ferris decision,” he told HR Dive via email; “That would return us to square one, again upending decades of precedent and twisting typical arm’s-length business relationships into evidence of joint employer status.”



Source link

Previous Post

Number of the day: lack of retirement savings

Next Post

Giving Employees PTO Before They Start: The Newest Perk?

Next Post

Giving Employees PTO Before They Start: The Newest Perk?

Recommended

5 HR Technologies for Improved Recruiting and Hiring

August 6, 2022

20 Vital Questions that Will Help You Find Your Dream Job

August 4, 2022

Don't miss it

Talent Acquisition

New DOL Proposed Overtime Rule Expected In October 2022

August 19, 2022
Talent Acquisition

FOIA request prompts feds to ask: Should contractors’ EEO-1 data be made public?

August 19, 2022
Talent Acquisition

5 ways to retain high-performing employees

August 19, 2022
News

USC Viterbi Data Analytics Bootcamp: Review, Cost, and Guide

August 19, 2022
News

How to Improve Your Problem-Solving Skills

August 19, 2022
Jobs

Popular K-12 Tool Edmodo Shuts Down

August 19, 2022

© 2022 Job Seeker News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Career
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Talent Acquisition
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Career
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Talent Acquisition
  • Contact us

© 2022 Job Seeker News Hubb All rights reserved.